| Title |
Monotherapy laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular oedema
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010859.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eliane C Jorge, Edson N Jorge, Mayra Botelho, Joyce G Farat, Gianni Virgili, Regina El Dib |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 185 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
| Researcher | 20 | 11% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 66 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 80 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,564,179
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,256
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,148
of 360,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#153
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.