↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Monotherapy laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular oedema

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
Title
Monotherapy laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular oedema
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010859.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eliane C Jorge, Edson N Jorge, Mayra Botelho, Joyce G Farat, Gianni Virgili, Regina El Dib

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 154 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Other 7 5%
Other 34 22%
Unknown 42 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Computer Science 4 3%
Unspecified 4 3%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 51 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2021.
All research outputs
#5,351,017
of 22,438,228 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,214
of 12,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,920
of 297,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#72
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,438,228 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.