| Title |
Ergonomic interventions for preventing work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb and neck among office workers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008570.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Victor CW Hoe, Donna M Urquhart, Helen L Kelsall, Eva N Zamri, Malcolm R Sim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 5 | 7% |
| Spain | 4 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
| Brazil | 4 | 5% |
| Australia | 4 | 5% |
| Canada | 4 | 5% |
| Finland | 3 | 4% |
| Belgium | 3 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 23% |
| Unknown | 23 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 77% |
| Scientists | 15 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 736 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 736 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 96 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 73 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 6% |
| Researcher | 37 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 32 | 4% |
| Other | 105 | 14% |
| Unknown | 347 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 109 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 108 | 15% |
| Engineering | 31 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 19 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 2% |
| Other | 76 | 10% |
| Unknown | 380 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 162. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2022.
All research outputs
#241,803
of 24,701,594 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#404
of 12,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,078
of 355,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,701,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.