↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mirtazapine versus other antidepressive agents for depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
Title
Mirtazapine versus other antidepressive agents for depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006528.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Norio Watanabe, Ichiro M Omori, Atsuo Nakagawa, Andrea Cipriani, Corrado Barbui, Rachel Churchill, Toshi A Furukawa

Abstract

Mirtazapine has a unique mechanism of antidepressive action and is one of the commonly used antidepressants in clinical practice.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 196 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 16%
Student > Bachelor 29 15%
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 9%
Other 40 20%
Unknown 29 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 39%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 9%
Psychology 17 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Neuroscience 10 5%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 35 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2018.
All research outputs
#859,177
of 17,353,889 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,246
of 11,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,765
of 224,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#90
of 486 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,353,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 486 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.