The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Sexual intercourse for cervical ripening and induction of labour
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2001
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003093 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Josephine Kavanagh, Anthony J Kelly, Jane Thomas |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 21 | 43% |
United States | 3 | 6% |
Australia | 2 | 4% |
Denmark | 1 | 2% |
Comoros | 1 | 2% |
Timor-Leste | 1 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 19 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 45 | 92% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 158 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 25 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 22 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 9% |
Researcher | 13 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 5% |
Other | 25 | 16% |
Unknown | 54 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 32% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
Psychology | 6 | 4% |
Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
Other | 13 | 8% |
Unknown | 58 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2024.
All research outputs
#464,649
of 26,313,853 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#775
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234
of 43,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,313,853 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.