↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Edaravone for acute ischaemic stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Edaravone for acute ischaemic stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007230.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shejun Feng, Qingwei Yang, Ming Liu, Weizheng Li, Wenming Yuan, Shihong Zhang, Bo Wu, Juntao Li

Abstract

Neuroprotection is a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. Edaravone is a neuroprotective agent that has been widely used in China, and several studies have suggested that it may be beneficial in acute ischaemic stroke.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 87 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 15%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 20 23%
Unknown 24 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Neuroscience 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 26 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2016.
All research outputs
#5,956,002
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,770
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,228
of 240,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#102
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.