↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Percutaneous vascular interventions versus intravenous thrombolytic treatment for acute ischaemic stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Percutaneous vascular interventions versus intravenous thrombolytic treatment for acute ischaemic stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009292.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haakon Lindekleiv, Eivind Berge, Karsten MH Bruins Slot, Joanna M Wardlaw

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 115 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Other 12 10%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 33 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 12%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 42 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,201,039
of 19,196,040 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,844
of 11,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,825
of 336,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#56
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,196,040 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.