↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Percutaneous vascular interventions versus intravenous thrombolytic treatment for acute ischaemic stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
Title
Percutaneous vascular interventions versus intravenous thrombolytic treatment for acute ischaemic stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009292.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haakon Lindekleiv, Eivind Berge, Karsten MH Bruins Slot, Joanna M Wardlaw

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 161 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 16%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Other 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Researcher 7 4%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 62 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 73 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2019.
All research outputs
#6,517,937
of 25,372,398 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,089
of 12,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,689
of 348,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#161
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,372,398 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.