| Title |
Exercise for treating fibromyalgia syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003786.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Angela J Busch, Karen A.R. Barber, Tom J Overend, Paul Michael J Peloso, Candice L Schachter |
| Abstract |
Fibromyalgia (FMS) is a syndrome expressed by chronic widespread body pain which leads to reduced physical function and frequent use of health care services. Exercise training is commonly recommended as a treatment. This is an update of a review published in Issue 2, 2002. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 13 | 39% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 15% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Mexico | 2 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 82% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 843 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 7 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 821 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 135 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 133 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 66 | 8% |
| Researcher | 53 | 6% |
| Other | 172 | 20% |
| Unknown | 216 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 250 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 140 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 54 | 6% |
| Psychology | 45 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 3% |
| Other | 99 | 12% |
| Unknown | 231 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2022.
All research outputs
#660,604
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,204
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,036
of 91,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.