| Title |
Biocompatible dialysis fluids for peritoneal dialysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007554.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Htay, David W Johnson, Kathryn J Wiggins, Sunil V Badve, Jonathan C Craig, Giovanni FM Strippoli, Yeoungjee Cho |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 14% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Australia | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 81% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 238 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 8% |
| Researcher | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 59 | 25% |
| Unknown | 67 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 19 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 12% |
| Unknown | 77 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,120,654
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,502
of 12,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,969
of 351,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#72
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.