| Title |
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007447.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francesca A Soldani, Thomas Lamont, Kate Jones, Linda Young, Tanya Walsh, Rizwana Lala, Janet E Clarkson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 105 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 26 | 25% |
| Saudi Arabia | 6 | 6% |
| United States | 5 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Japan | 3 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Libya | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 39 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 60 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 27 | 26% |
| Scientists | 16 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 336 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 47 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 6% |
| Researcher | 17 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 51 | 15% |
| Unknown | 155 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 98 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 8% |
| Psychology | 11 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 23 | 7% |
| Unknown | 165 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2023.
All research outputs
#421,002
of 25,809,966 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#735
of 13,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,050
of 365,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,966 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.