↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Regimens of fetal surveillance for impaired fetal growth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Regimens of fetal surveillance for impaired fetal growth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007113.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosalie M Grivell, Lufee Wong, Vineesh Bhatia

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Unknown 83 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 22%
Student > Bachelor 18 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Psychology 8 9%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 16 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2019.
All research outputs
#12,942,669
of 14,679,099 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,709
of 11,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,297
of 317,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#71
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,679,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.