| Title |
Subpial transection surgery for epilepsy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008153.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Balaji Krishnaiah, Sridharan Ramaratnam, Lakshmi Narasimhan Ranganathan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 35 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 28% |
| Psychology | 8 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 38 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,905,213
of 24,652,007 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,664
of 12,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,836
of 356,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#133
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,652,007 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.