↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical portosystemic shunts versus transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for variceal haemorrhage in people with cirrhosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
Title
Surgical portosystemic shunts versus transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for variceal haemorrhage in people with cirrhosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001023.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Brand, Leanne Prodehl, Chikwendu J Ede

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 158 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Student > Master 18 11%
Researcher 12 8%
Other 7 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 67 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 9%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Unspecified 3 2%
Psychology 2 1%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 71 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,003,233
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,594
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,340
of 364,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#167
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.