↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Medical and surgical treatment for ocular myasthenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Medical and surgical treatment for ocular myasthenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005081.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Benatar, Henry Kaminski

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 103 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Professor 8 8%
Other 27 26%
Unknown 20 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 18 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,477,407
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,556
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,019
of 333,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#138
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.