↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Home‐based child development interventions for preschool children from socially disadvantaged families

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
Title
Home‐based child development interventions for preschool children from socially disadvantaged families
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008131.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Miller, Lisa K Maguire, Geraldine Macdonald

Abstract

Social disadvantage can have a significant impact on early child development, health and wellbeing. What happens during this critical period is important for all aspects of development. Caregiving competence and the quality of the environment play an important role in supporting development in young children and parents have an important role to play in optimising child development and mitigating the negative effects of social disadvantage. Home-based child development programmes aim to optimise children's developmental outcomes through educating, training and supporting parents in their own home to provide a more nurturing and stimulating environment for their child.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 232 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 21%
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 37 16%
Unknown 62 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 22%
Social Sciences 32 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 13%
Psychology 28 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 2%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 74 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2018.
All research outputs
#6,738,869
of 25,388,353 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,298
of 12,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,037
of 246,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#105
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,353 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.