↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Home‐based child development interventions for preschool children from socially disadvantaged families

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
Title
Home‐based child development interventions for preschool children from socially disadvantaged families
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008131.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Miller, Lisa K Maguire, Geraldine Macdonald

Abstract

Social disadvantage can have a significant impact on early child development, health and wellbeing. What happens during this critical period is important for all aspects of development. Caregiving competence and the quality of the environment play an important role in supporting development in young children and parents have an important role to play in optimising child development and mitigating the negative effects of social disadvantage. Home-based child development programmes aim to optimise children's developmental outcomes through educating, training and supporting parents in their own home to provide a more nurturing and stimulating environment for their child.

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 242 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 20%
Researcher 28 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 37 15%
Unknown 69 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 21%
Social Sciences 32 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 12%
Psychology 28 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 2%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 81 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2018.
All research outputs
#6,783,328
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,921
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,613
of 247,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#104
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.