↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cannabis for the treatment of ulcerative colitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
60 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
Cannabis for the treatment of ulcerative colitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012954.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tahir S Kafil, Tran M Nguyen, John K MacDonald, Nilesh Chande

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 166 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 17%
Student > Master 26 16%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Other 16 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 44 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 49 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2020.
All research outputs
#523,065
of 17,654,026 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,228
of 11,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,722
of 328,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,654,026 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.