The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Maternal position in the second stage of labour for women with epidural anaesthesia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008070.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kate F Walker, Marion Kibuka, Jim G Thornton, Nia W Jones |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 19% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 77% |
| Scientists | 3 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 451 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 450 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 64 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 54 | 12% |
| Researcher | 33 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 91 | 20% |
| Unknown | 154 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 119 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 103 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 12 | 3% |
| Psychology | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 37 | 8% |
| Unknown | 156 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,016,902
of 26,312,176 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,132
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,830
of 365,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#102
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,312,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.