↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Strategies to improve the implementation of workplace‐based policies or practices targeting tobacco, alcohol, diet, physical activity and obesity

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
34 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
652 Mendeley
Title
Strategies to improve the implementation of workplace‐based policies or practices targeting tobacco, alcohol, diet, physical activity and obesity
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012439.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luke Wolfenden, Sharni Goldman, Fiona G Stacey, Alice Grady, Melanie Kingsland, Christopher M Williams, John Wiggers, Andrew Milat, Chris Rissel, Adrian Bauman, Margaret M Farrell, France Légaré, Ali Ben Charif, Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun, Rebecca K Hodder, Jannah Jones, Debbie Booth, Benjamin Parmenter, Tim Regan, Sze Lin Yoong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 652 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 652 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 99 15%
Researcher 70 11%
Student > Bachelor 59 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 8%
Other 30 5%
Other 121 19%
Unknown 219 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 123 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 111 17%
Social Sciences 35 5%
Psychology 33 5%
Sports and Recreations 20 3%
Other 86 13%
Unknown 244 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,093,493
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,229
of 11,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,915
of 354,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.