The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Strategies to improve the implementation of workplace‐based policies or practices targeting tobacco, alcohol, diet, physical activity and obesity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012439.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luke Wolfenden, Sharni Goldman, Fiona G Stacey, Alice Grady, Melanie Kingsland, Christopher M Williams, John Wiggers, Andrew Milat, Chris Rissel, Adrian Bauman, Margaret M Farrell, France Légaré, Ali Ben Charif, Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun, Rebecca K Hodder, Jannah Jones, Debbie Booth, Benjamin Parmenter, Tim Regan, Sze Lin Yoong |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Australia | 3 | 9% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Chile | 2 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 41% |
| Members of the public | 12 | 35% |
| Scientists | 7 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 661 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 661 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 100 | 15% |
| Researcher | 75 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 30 | 5% |
| Other | 123 | 19% |
| Unknown | 221 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 121 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 115 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 35 | 5% |
| Psychology | 33 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 20 | 3% |
| Other | 90 | 14% |
| Unknown | 247 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,153,490
of 26,338,415 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,199
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,282
of 358,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#69
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,338,415 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.