↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

First-line drugs inhibiting the renin angiotensin system versus other first-line antihypertensive drug classes for hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
29 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
Title
First-line drugs inhibiting the renin angiotensin system versus other first-line antihypertensive drug classes for hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008170.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu Jie Chen, Liang Jin Li, Wen Lu Tang, Jia Yang Song, Ru Qiu, Qian Li, Hao Xue, James M Wright

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 172 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Postgraduate 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 44 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 53 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,270,320
of 17,342,898 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,282
of 11,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,517
of 322,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,342,898 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.