| Title |
Community‐based supplementary feeding for food insecure, vulnerable and malnourished populations – an overview of systematic reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010578.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Janicke Visser, Milla H McLachlan, Nicola Maayan, Paul Garner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| South Africa | 2 | 25% |
| Ireland | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 958 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 958 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 125 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 99 | 10% |
| Researcher | 95 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 66 | 7% |
| Other | 48 | 5% |
| Other | 164 | 17% |
| Unknown | 361 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 189 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 126 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 39 | 4% |
| Psychology | 38 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 3% |
| Other | 125 | 13% |
| Unknown | 417 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,608,573
of 25,623,883 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,228
of 13,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,166
of 363,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#133
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,623,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.