The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Psychosocial interventions to reduce alcohol consumption in concurrent problem alcohol and illicit drug users
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009269.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan Klimas, Christopher Fairgrieve, Helen Tobin, Catherine‐Anne Field, Clodagh SM O'Gorman, Liam G Glynn, Eamon Keenan, Jean Saunders, Gerard Bury, Colum Dunne, Walter Cullen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 60% |
| Scientists | 5 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 373 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 373 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 45 | 12% |
| Researcher | 34 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 55 | 15% |
| Unknown | 172 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 8% |
| Psychology | 27 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 36 | 10% |
| Unknown | 187 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,423,826
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,816
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,328
of 450,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#108
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.