| Title |
Psychosocial interventions to reduce alcohol consumption in concurrent problem alcohol and illicit drug users
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009269.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan Klimas, Christopher Fairgrieve, Helen Tobin, Catherine-Anne Field, Clodagh SM O'Gorman, Liam G Glynn, Eamon Keenan, Jean Saunders, Gerard Bury, Colum Dunne, Walter Cullen |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 65% |
| Scientists | 5 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 333 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 13% |
| Researcher | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 53 | 16% |
| Unknown | 141 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 8% |
| Psychology | 27 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 34 | 10% |
| Unknown | 155 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,323,420
of 23,876,851 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,944
of 12,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,347
of 443,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#119
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,876,851 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.