↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Traditional Chinese herbal medicine for vascular dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
13 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
350 Mendeley
Title
Traditional Chinese herbal medicine for vascular dementia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010284.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edwin SY Chan, Dianne T Bautista, Yanan Zhu, Yong You, Jian Ting Long, Wenyun Li, Christopher Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 349 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 15%
Student > Bachelor 54 15%
Researcher 29 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 5%
Other 16 5%
Other 50 14%
Unknown 130 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 12%
Psychology 14 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 3%
Neuroscience 9 3%
Other 44 13%
Unknown 143 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,936,304
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,104
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,671
of 448,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#95
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.