↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Oral and intrauterine progestogens for atypical endometrial hyperplasia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
Title
Oral and intrauterine progestogens for atypical endometrial hyperplasia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009458.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li Luo, Bing Luo, Ying Zheng, Heng Zhang, Jing Li, Neil Sidell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 131 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 15%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 41 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 11%
Psychology 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 45 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,074,627
of 22,549,926 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,760
of 12,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,855
of 431,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,549,926 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.