↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Oral and intrauterine progestogens for atypical endometrial hyperplasia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
Title
Oral and intrauterine progestogens for atypical endometrial hyperplasia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009458.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li Luo, Bing Luo, Ying Zheng, Heng Zhang, Jing Li, Neil Sidell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 164 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Researcher 15 9%
Other 11 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 59 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 10%
Psychology 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 66 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,130,047
of 25,372,398 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,529
of 12,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,417
of 433,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#151
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,372,398 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.