The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 184 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Exercise therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome (individual patient data)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011040.pub2 |
Authors |
Lillebeth Larun, Jan Odgaard‐Jensen, Kjetil G Brurberg, Trudie Chalder, Marianne Dybwad, Rona E Moss‐Morris, Michael Sharpe, Karen Wallman, Alison Wearden, Peter D White, Paul P Glasziou |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 29 | 16% |
United States | 11 | 6% |
Canada | 6 | 3% |
Netherlands | 4 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | 2% |
Unknown | 125 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 158 | 86% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 7% |
Scientists | 9 | 5% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 18% |
Librarian | 2 | 12% |
Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 18% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 6% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 135. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#329,526
of 26,560,265 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#535
of 13,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,769
of 450,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,560,265 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.