↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube for percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in critically ill adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
Title
Laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube for percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in critically ill adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009901.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reinhard Strametz, Martin N Bergold, Tobias Weberschock

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 225 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 12%
Researcher 20 9%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Other 12 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 4%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 98 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 10%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Engineering 4 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 1%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 108 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2020.
All research outputs
#14,843,854
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,168
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,304
of 354,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#186
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.