| Title |
Implantable cardiac defibrillators for people with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012738.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohamad El Moheb, Johny Nicolas, Assem M Khamis, Ghida Iskandarani, Elie A Akl, Marwan Refaat |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 15% |
| Spain | 5 | 15% |
| Canada | 4 | 12% |
| Lebanon | 2 | 6% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | 3% |
| Egypt | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 5 | 15% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 24% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 179 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 13% |
| Researcher | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Unknown | 67 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 8% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Unknown | 73 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,994,500
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,371
of 12,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,816
of 444,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#106
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.