↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Reflectance confocal microscopy for diagnosing cutaneous melanoma in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
Title
Reflectance confocal microscopy for diagnosing cutaneous melanoma in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013190
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqueline Dinnes, Jonathan J Deeks, Daniel Saleh, Naomi Chuchu, Susan E Bayliss, Lopa Patel, Clare Davenport, Yemisi Takwoingi, Kathie Godfrey, Rubeta N Matin, Rakesh Patalay, Hywel C Williams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 228 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 14%
Student > Bachelor 28 12%
Researcher 19 8%
Other 12 5%
Student > Postgraduate 12 5%
Other 53 23%
Unknown 71 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Unspecified 13 6%
Psychology 9 4%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 78 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,235,082
of 16,011,902 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,299
of 11,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,473
of 389,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,011,902 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.