↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Reflectance confocal microscopy for diagnosing cutaneous melanoma in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
Title
Reflectance confocal microscopy for diagnosing cutaneous melanoma in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013190
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqueline Dinnes, Jonathan J Deeks, Daniel Saleh, Naomi Chuchu, Susan E Bayliss, Lopa Patel, Clare Davenport, Yemisi Takwoingi, Kathie Godfrey, Rubeta N Matin, Rakesh Patalay, Hywel C Williams

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 262 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 15%
Student > Bachelor 34 13%
Researcher 19 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 6%
Other 14 5%
Other 49 19%
Unknown 92 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 8%
Psychology 11 4%
Unspecified 9 3%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 99 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,306,484
of 24,291,750 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,898
of 12,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,184
of 445,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#116
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,291,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,880 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.