↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Reflectance confocal microscopy for diagnosing cutaneous melanoma in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
Title
Reflectance confocal microscopy for diagnosing cutaneous melanoma in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013190
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqueline Dinnes, Jonathan J Deeks, Daniel Saleh, Naomi Chuchu, Susan E Bayliss, Lopa Patel, Clare Davenport, Yemisi Takwoingi, Kathie Godfrey, Rubeta N Matin, Rakesh Patalay, Hywel C Williams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 259 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 14%
Student > Bachelor 36 14%
Researcher 19 7%
Unspecified 15 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 5%
Other 53 20%
Unknown 86 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 9%
Unspecified 15 6%
Psychology 11 4%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 93 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,008,983
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,400
of 12,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,186
of 437,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.