↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Reflectance confocal microscopy for diagnosing keratinocyte skin cancers in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Reflectance confocal microscopy for diagnosing keratinocyte skin cancers in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013191
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqueline Dinnes, Jonathan J Deeks, Naomi Chuchu, Daniel Saleh, Susan E Bayliss, Yemisi Takwoingi, Clare Davenport, Lopa Patel, Rubeta N Matin, Colette O'Sullivan, Rakesh Patalay, Hywel C Williams

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 20%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 4%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 45 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 33%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 49 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,568,822
of 16,395,544 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,020
of 11,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,729
of 392,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,395,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.