↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Reflectance confocal microscopy for diagnosing keratinocyte skin cancers in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
Title
Reflectance confocal microscopy for diagnosing keratinocyte skin cancers in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013191
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqueline Dinnes, Jonathan J Deeks, Naomi Chuchu, Daniel Saleh, Susan E Bayliss, Yemisi Takwoingi, Clare Davenport, Lopa Patel, Rubeta N Matin, Colette O'Sullivan, Rakesh Patalay, Hywel C Williams

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 200 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 18%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Other 9 5%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 73 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 8%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Psychology 7 4%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 81 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,573,690
of 21,933,216 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,254
of 12,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,587
of 426,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,933,216 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.