↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Smartphone applications for triaging adults with skin lesions that are suspicious for melanoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
26 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
398 Mendeley
Title
Smartphone applications for triaging adults with skin lesions that are suspicious for melanoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013192
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naomi Chuchu, Yemisi Takwoingi, Jacqueline Dinnes, Rubeta N Matin, Oliver Bassett, Jacqueline F Moreau, Susan E Bayliss, Clare Davenport, Kathie Godfrey, Susan O'Connell, Abhilash Jain, Fiona M Walter, Jonathan J Deeks, Hywel C Williams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 398 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 398 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 13%
Student > Bachelor 49 12%
Researcher 32 8%
Other 24 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 6%
Other 90 23%
Unknown 130 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 9%
Social Sciences 17 4%
Unspecified 16 4%
Psychology 15 4%
Other 68 17%
Unknown 144 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2022.
All research outputs
#428,111
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#776
of 12,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,630
of 436,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.