↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Smartphone applications for triaging adults with skin lesions that are suspicious for melanoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
27 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
279 Mendeley
Title
Smartphone applications for triaging adults with skin lesions that are suspicious for melanoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013192
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naomi Chuchu, Yemisi Takwoingi, Jacqueline Dinnes, Rubeta N Matin, Oliver Bassett, Jacqueline F Moreau, Susan E Bayliss, Clare Davenport, Kathie Godfrey, Susan O'Connell, Abhilash Jain, Fiona M Walter, Jonathan J Deeks, Hywel C Williams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 279 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 15%
Student > Bachelor 40 14%
Researcher 28 10%
Other 19 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 6%
Other 60 22%
Unknown 73 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 10%
Social Sciences 14 5%
Computer Science 13 5%
Psychology 12 4%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 85 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2021.
All research outputs
#388,345
of 18,838,632 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#820
of 11,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,375
of 405,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,838,632 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.