Title |
Pre-emptive and preventive opioids for postoperative pain in adults undergoing all types of surgery
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012624.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Brett Doleman, Jo Leonardi-Bee, Thomas P Heinink, Debamita Bhattacharjee, Jon N Lund, John P Williams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 44% |
Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 213 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 30 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 27 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 7% |
Researcher | 11 | 5% |
Other | 30 | 14% |
Unknown | 86 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 3% |
Psychology | 6 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
Other | 23 | 11% |
Unknown | 98 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2021.
All research outputs
#3,653,372
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,158
of 12,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,086
of 437,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#145
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.