↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pre‐emptive versus non pre‐emptive kidney transplantation for end‐stage kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Pre‐emptive versus non pre‐emptive kidney transplantation for end‐stage kidney disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013073
Authors

Camila Olarte Parra, Cedric Van de Bruaene, Laurens Weynants, Evi V Nagler, Alexandra McAleenan, Roy G Elbers, Julian P T Higgins, Els Goetghebeur

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 27%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 27%
Psychology 2 13%
Computer Science 1 7%
Mathematics 1 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 5 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2018.
All research outputs
#14,775,738
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,581
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,677
of 449,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#195
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.