| Title |
Timing of renal replacement therapy initiation for acute kidney injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010612.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alicia Isabel I Fayad, Daniel G Buamscha, Agustín Ciapponi |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 4 | 13% |
| Argentina | 4 | 13% |
| Australia | 3 | 9% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 3% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 167 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Researcher | 17 | 10% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 61 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 4% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 66 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,673,199
of 24,378,020 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,738
of 12,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,634
of 443,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#99
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,378,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.