↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Short‐acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin for adult, non‐pregnant persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
30 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
296 Mendeley
Title
Short‐acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin for adult, non‐pregnant persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013228
Pubmed ID
Authors

Birgit Fullerton, Andrea Siebenhofer, Klaus Jeitler, Karl Horvath, Thomas Semlitsch, Andrea Berghold, Ferdinand M Gerlach

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 296 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 15%
Student > Bachelor 33 11%
Researcher 21 7%
Other 16 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 53 18%
Unknown 114 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 4%
Unspecified 13 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 4%
Other 31 10%
Unknown 122 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,152,925
of 26,052,823 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,238
of 13,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,761
of 433,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#70
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,052,823 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.