↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Uterotonic agents for preventing postpartum haemorrhage: a network meta‐analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
32 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
512 Mendeley
Title
Uterotonic agents for preventing postpartum haemorrhage: a network meta‐analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011689.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ioannis D Gallos, Argyro Papadopoulou, Rebecca Man, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Aurelio Tobias, Malcolm J Price, Myfanwy J Williams, Virginia Diaz, Julia Pasquale, Monica Chamillard, Mariana Widmer, Özge Tunçalp, G Justus Hofmeyr, Fernando Althabe, Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu, Joshua P Vogel, Olufemi T Oladapo, Arri Coomarasamy

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 512 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 512 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 52 10%
Researcher 50 10%
Student > Master 44 9%
Student > Postgraduate 36 7%
Other 35 7%
Other 91 18%
Unknown 204 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 151 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 60 12%
Social Sciences 13 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 2%
Psychology 9 2%
Other 51 10%
Unknown 218 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,084,668
of 26,544,284 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,018
of 13,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,410
of 449,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,544,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.