↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Uterotonic agents for preventing postpartum haemorrhage: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
44 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
403 Mendeley
Title
Uterotonic agents for preventing postpartum haemorrhage: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011689.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ioannis D Gallos, Argyro Papadopoulou, Rebecca Man, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Aurelio Tobias, Malcolm J Price, Myfanwy J Williams, Virginia Diaz, Julia Pasquale, Monica Chamillard, Mariana Widmer, Özge Tunçalp, G Justus Hofmeyr, Fernando Althabe, Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu, Joshua P Vogel, Olufemi T Oladapo, Arri Coomarasamy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 403 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 403 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 47 12%
Researcher 41 10%
Student > Master 41 10%
Other 33 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 8%
Other 81 20%
Unknown 129 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 139 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 13%
Social Sciences 11 3%
Psychology 10 2%
Unspecified 9 2%
Other 43 11%
Unknown 140 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2021.
All research outputs
#688,347
of 22,118,869 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,449
of 12,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,594
of 424,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,118,869 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.