| Title |
Uterotonic agents for preventing postpartum haemorrhage: a network meta‐analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011689.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ioannis D Gallos, Argyro Papadopoulou, Rebecca Man, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Aurelio Tobias, Malcolm J Price, Myfanwy J Williams, Virginia Diaz, Julia Pasquale, Monica Chamillard, Mariana Widmer, Özge Tunçalp, G Justus Hofmeyr, Fernando Althabe, Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu, Joshua P Vogel, Olufemi T Oladapo, Arri Coomarasamy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 33% |
| Japan | 4 | 12% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Papua New Guinea | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 3% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 506 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 506 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 10% |
| Researcher | 47 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 8% |
| Other | 36 | 7% |
| Other | 100 | 20% |
| Unknown | 187 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 147 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 59 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 18 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 15 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 56 | 11% |
| Unknown | 201 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2023.
All research outputs
#994,434
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,995
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,478
of 444,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.