↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Uterotonic agents for preventing postpartum haemorrhage: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
36 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
Title
Uterotonic agents for preventing postpartum haemorrhage: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011689.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ioannis D Gallos, Argyro Papadopoulou, Rebecca Man, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Aurelio Tobias, Malcolm J Price, Myfanwy J Williams, Virginia Diaz, Julia Pasquale, Monica Chamillard, Mariana Widmer, Özge Tunçalp, G Justus Hofmeyr, Fernando Althabe, Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu, Joshua P Vogel, Olufemi T Oladapo, Arri Coomarasamy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 267 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 13%
Student > Master 34 13%
Researcher 32 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 10%
Other 21 8%
Other 48 18%
Unknown 72 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 103 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 13%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Psychology 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 80 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#573,436
of 17,371,891 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,414
of 11,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,731
of 394,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,371,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.