| Title |
Single herbal medicine for diabetic retinopathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007939.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hong Wei Zhang, Hongying Zhang, Suzanne J Grant, Xia Wan, Guochun Li |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 50% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 13% |
| France | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 202 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 13% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 16% |
| Unknown | 70 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 15% |
| Unknown | 81 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,782,134
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,280
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,146
of 433,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#151
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.