↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non-pharmacological interventions for chronic pain in multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
17 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
301 Mendeley
Title
Non-pharmacological interventions for chronic pain in multiple sclerosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012622.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bhasker Amatya, Jamie Young, Fary Khan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 301 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 20%
Student > Bachelor 42 14%
Researcher 30 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 80 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 66 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 61 20%
Psychology 22 7%
Neuroscience 17 6%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Other 36 12%
Unknown 91 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,118,618
of 17,533,860 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,901
of 11,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,834
of 394,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,533,860 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.