↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Timing of dornase alfa inhalation for cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
Timing of dornase alfa inhalation for cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007923.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth Dentice, Mark Elkins

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Student > Master 12 11%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Other 7 7%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 37 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 16%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 41 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2020.
All research outputs
#16,558,017
of 26,574,355 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,200
of 13,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,794
of 359,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#212
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,574,355 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.