The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
Cyclobenzaprine for the treatment of myofascial pain in adults
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006830.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Frederico MG Leite, Álvaro N Atallah, Regina El Dib, Eduardo Grossmann, Eduardo Januzzi, Regis B Andriolo, Edina MK da Silva |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 202 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 34 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
Researcher | 16 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
Other | 37 | 18% |
Unknown | 73 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 30% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 4% |
Psychology | 7 | 3% |
Other | 27 | 13% |
Unknown | 74 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,258,170
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,551
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,067
of 121,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.