↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Transfusion of red blood cells stored for shorter versus longer duration for all conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
43 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
Title
Transfusion of red blood cells stored for shorter versus longer duration for all conditions
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010801.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akshay Shah, Susan J Brunskill, Michael JR Desborough, Carolyn Doree, Marialena Trivella, Simon J Stanworth

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 179 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 15%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 48 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 13%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Psychology 6 3%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 61 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2019.
All research outputs
#853,384
of 18,812,327 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,097
of 11,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,790
of 402,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,812,327 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.