↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Sound therapy (using amplification devices and/or sound generators) for tinnitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
27 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
294 Mendeley
Title
Sound therapy (using amplification devices and/or sound generators) for tinnitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013094.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magdalena Sereda, Jun Xia, Amr El Refaie, Deborah A Hall, Derek J Hoare

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 294 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 22%
Student > Bachelor 39 13%
Researcher 36 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 5%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 90 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 17%
Psychology 25 9%
Neuroscience 11 4%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Other 39 13%
Unknown 102 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2022.
All research outputs
#567,510
of 22,385,407 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,137
of 12,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,792
of 425,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,385,407 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.