↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Sound therapy (using amplification devices and/or sound generators) for tinnitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
26 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
375 Mendeley
Title
Sound therapy (using amplification devices and/or sound generators) for tinnitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013094.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magdalena Sereda, Jun Xia, Amr El Refaie, Deborah A Hall, Derek J Hoare

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 375 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 375 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 18%
Student > Bachelor 46 12%
Researcher 42 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 4%
Other 34 9%
Unknown 143 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 53 14%
Psychology 27 7%
Neuroscience 13 3%
Social Sciences 9 2%
Other 43 11%
Unknown 159 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#633,772
of 25,941,588 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,091
of 13,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,053
of 448,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,941,588 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.