↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Early discontinuation of antibiotics for febrile neutropenia versus continuation until neutropenia resolution in people with cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
Early discontinuation of antibiotics for febrile neutropenia versus continuation until neutropenia resolution in people with cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012184.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anat Stern, Elena Carrara, Roni Bitterman, Dafna Yahav, Leonard Leibovici, Mical Paul

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 136 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 19%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Other 13 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 35 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 42 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2019.
All research outputs
#801,894
of 16,649,729 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,146
of 11,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,789
of 390,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,649,729 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.