Title |
Early discontinuation of antibiotics for febrile neutropenia versus continuation until neutropenia resolution in people with cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012184.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anat Stern, Elena Carrara, Roni Bitterman, Dafna Yahav, Leonard Leibovici, Mical Paul |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 7 | 15% |
United States | 7 | 15% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
Ireland | 2 | 4% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
Nepal | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 20 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 31 | 66% |
Scientists | 8 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 249 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 31 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 28 | 11% |
Other | 25 | 10% |
Researcher | 24 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 5% |
Other | 34 | 14% |
Unknown | 94 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 4% |
Psychology | 5 | 2% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
Other | 20 | 8% |
Unknown | 103 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,247,403
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,625
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,684
of 446,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.