↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Albendazole alone or in combination with microfilaricidal drugs for lymphatic filariasis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
52 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
Albendazole alone or in combination with microfilaricidal drugs for lymphatic filariasis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003753.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cara L Macfarlane, Shyam S Budhathoki, Samuel Johnson, Marty Richardson, Paul Garner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 21%
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Researcher 8 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 34 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Psychology 5 5%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 36 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2020.
All research outputs
#579,574
of 18,885,805 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,318
of 11,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,842
of 402,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,885,805 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.