| Title |
Disease management interventions for heart failure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002752.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Takeda, Nicole Martin, Rod S Taylor, Stephanie JC Taylor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 30% |
| Spain | 4 | 12% |
| Colombia | 2 | 6% |
| France | 2 | 6% |
| Peru | 2 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 21% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 525 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 525 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 73 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 11% |
| Researcher | 48 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 6% |
| Other | 88 | 17% |
| Unknown | 197 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 114 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 95 | 18% |
| Psychology | 16 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 60 | 11% |
| Unknown | 214 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,831,456
of 24,914,266 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,030
of 13,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,240
of 448,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#96
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,914,266 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,007 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.