↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Magnesium sulphate for women at risk of preterm birth for neuroprotection of the fetus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
471 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
425 Mendeley
Title
Magnesium sulphate for women at risk of preterm birth for neuroprotection of the fetus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004661.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lex W Doyle, Caroline A Crowther, Philippa Middleton, Stephane Marret, Dwight Rouse

Abstract

Epidemiological and basic science evidence suggests that magnesium sulphate before birth may be neuroprotective for the fetus.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 425 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 413 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 16%
Student > Bachelor 65 15%
Researcher 57 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 11%
Other 39 9%
Other 95 22%
Unknown 53 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 252 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 7%
Social Sciences 16 4%
Psychology 15 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Other 37 9%
Unknown 63 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,058,421
of 17,165,110 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,803
of 11,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,235
of 224,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 455 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,165,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,634 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 455 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.