↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

C-reactive protein for diagnosing late-onset infection in newborn infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
197 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
C-reactive protein for diagnosing late-onset infection in newborn infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012126.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Valeska Elli Brown, Nicholas Meader, Jemma Cleminson, William McGuire

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 197 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 151 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 17%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Postgraduate 13 9%
Other 10 7%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 41 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 48 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2019.
All research outputs
#186,572
of 18,940,883 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#339
of 11,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,968
of 459,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,940,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.