↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Gonadotrophins for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
283 Mendeley
Title
Gonadotrophins for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010290.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nienke S Weiss, Elena Kostova, Marleen Nahuis, Ben Willem J Mol, Fulco van der Veen, Madelon van Wely

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 283 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 11%
Researcher 27 10%
Student > Master 27 10%
Other 21 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 6%
Other 54 19%
Unknown 105 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 5%
Unspecified 14 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 3%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 124 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,811,229
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,899
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,987
of 447,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#85
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.