| Title |
Gonadotrophins for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010290.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nienke S Weiss, Elena Kostova, Marleen Nahuis, Ben Willem J Mol, Fulco van der Veen, Madelon van Wely |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Italy | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 274 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 10% |
| Researcher | 27 | 10% |
| Other | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 47 | 17% |
| Unknown | 102 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 81 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 10% |
| Unknown | 121 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,811,229
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,899
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,987
of 447,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#85
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.