↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Gonadotrophins for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
Title
Gonadotrophins for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010290.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nienke S Weiss, Elena Kostova, Marleen Nahuis, Ben Willem J Mol, Fulco van der Veen, Madelon van Wely

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 139 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 18%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Other 10 7%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 27 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 40 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,383,263
of 17,520,445 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,101
of 11,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,268
of 343,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,520,445 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.