Title |
Subacromial decompression surgery for rotator cuff disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005619.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Teemu V Karjalainen, Nitin B Jain, Cristina M Page, Tuomas A Lähdeoja, Renea V Johnston, Paul Salamh, Lauri Kavaja, Clare L Ardern, Arnav Agarwal, Per O Vandvik, Rachelle Buchbinder |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 97 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 19 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 7 | 7% |
United States | 5 | 5% |
Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
Australia | 2 | 2% |
Italy | 2 | 2% |
Germany | 2 | 2% |
Norway | 2 | 2% |
Argentina | 1 | 1% |
Other | 8 | 8% |
Unknown | 47 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 70 | 72% |
Scientists | 14 | 14% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 456 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 456 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 70 | 15% |
Student > Master | 51 | 11% |
Researcher | 37 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 7% |
Other | 29 | 6% |
Other | 75 | 16% |
Unknown | 162 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 124 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 77 | 17% |
Sports and Recreations | 13 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
Neuroscience | 6 | 1% |
Other | 39 | 9% |
Unknown | 190 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#351,936
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#592
of 13,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,834
of 449,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.