| Title |
Low dialysate sodium levels for chronic haemodialysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011204.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joanna L Dunlop, Alain C Vandal, Mark R Marshall |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 18% |
| Turkey | 1 | 9% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 202 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 13% |
| Researcher | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 15% |
| Unknown | 75 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 3% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 85 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,329,445
of 23,879,989 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,097
of 12,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,713
of 444,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#129
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,879,989 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.