↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Adverse events in people taking macrolide antibiotics versus placebo for any indication

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
58 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
Title
Adverse events in people taking macrolide antibiotics versus placebo for any indication
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011825.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Malene Plejdrup Hansen, Anna M Scott, Amanda McCullough, Sarah Thorning, Jeffrey K Aronson, Elaine M Beller, Paul P Glasziou, Tammy C Hoffmann, Justin Clark, Chris B Del Mar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 236 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 16%
Student > Bachelor 35 15%
Researcher 27 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 10%
Other 14 6%
Other 37 16%
Unknown 63 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 37 16%
Unknown 80 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#511,635
of 18,009,382 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,167
of 11,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,891
of 347,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,009,382 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.