↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Adverse events in people taking macrolide antibiotics versus placebo for any indication

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
61 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
317 Mendeley
Title
Adverse events in people taking macrolide antibiotics versus placebo for any indication
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011825.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Malene Plejdrup Hansen, Anna M Scott, Amanda McCullough, Sarah Thorning, Jeffrey K Aronson, Elaine M Beller, Paul P Glasziou, Tammy C Hoffmann, Justin Clark, Chris B Del Mar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 317 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 317 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 45 14%
Student > Master 42 13%
Researcher 29 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 9%
Other 18 6%
Other 45 14%
Unknown 111 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 3%
Other 45 14%
Unknown 132 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2022.
All research outputs
#543,805
of 21,843,592 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,099
of 12,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,732
of 372,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,843,592 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.