↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Local anaesthetic wound infiltration and abdominal nerves block during caesarean section for postoperative pain relief

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
283 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Local anaesthetic wound infiltration and abdominal nerves block during caesarean section for postoperative pain relief
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006954.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony A Bamigboye, G Justus Hofmeyr

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 274 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 14%
Student > Postgraduate 29 10%
Student > Master 26 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 9%
Other 23 8%
Other 58 20%
Unknown 81 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 128 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 7%
Psychology 19 7%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 15 5%
Unknown 88 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,236,093
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,304
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,009
of 121,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.