↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Inpatient versus outpatient care, partial hospitalisation and waiting list for people with eating disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
49 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
352 Mendeley
Title
Inpatient versus outpatient care, partial hospitalisation and waiting list for people with eating disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010827.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Phillipa J Hay, Stephen Touyz, Angélica M Claudino, Sanja Lujic, Caroline A Smith, Sloane Madden

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 352 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 352 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 15%
Student > Bachelor 44 13%
Researcher 43 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 49 14%
Unknown 116 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 18%
Psychology 46 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 13%
Social Sciences 13 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Other 41 12%
Unknown 135 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2021.
All research outputs
#965,860
of 21,751,441 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,202
of 12,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,505
of 371,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,751,441 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.