↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Inpatient versus outpatient care, partial hospitalisation and waiting list for people with eating disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
45 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
437 Mendeley
Title
Inpatient versus outpatient care, partial hospitalisation and waiting list for people with eating disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010827.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Phillipa J Hay, Stephen Touyz, Angélica M Claudino, Sanja Lujic, Caroline A Smith, Sloane Madden

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 437 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 437 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 12%
Student > Bachelor 46 11%
Researcher 45 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 5%
Other 68 16%
Unknown 168 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 18%
Psychology 48 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 11%
Social Sciences 15 3%
Unspecified 14 3%
Other 45 10%
Unknown 189 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,206,253
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,496
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,207
of 451,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.