↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Inpatient versus outpatient care, partial hospitalisation and waiting list for people with eating disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
50 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
Title
Inpatient versus outpatient care, partial hospitalisation and waiting list for people with eating disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010827.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Phillipa J Hay, Stephen Touyz, Angélica M Claudino, Sanja Lujic, Caroline A Smith, Sloane Madden

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 250 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 17%
Student > Bachelor 34 14%
Researcher 32 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 64 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 15%
Psychology 34 14%
Social Sciences 13 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 77 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2021.
All research outputs
#764,220
of 18,057,469 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,893
of 11,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,134
of 348,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,057,469 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.